Futaba 2.4 modules and 7 channel RX - any views?
Posted: March 30th, 2011, 4:55 pm
My big 2.4 dither before taking the plunge continues.............
Moving on from 35 MHz (9 ZAP with mainly PCM 149 RXs)
Does anybody have first hand experience (good or bad) of the following.
Futaba 8 channel 2.4 module to go in my 9ZAP (about £118)
Futaba 7 channel receivers (currently on special offer at £50)
May also consider the equivalent Jeti gear. Their module is about £50 cheaper, receivers are a similar price.
My current thinking is either of the above for my better models (two receivers in the largest models to provide redundancy) plus my FrSky module (in a different transmitter) with their receivers for my seldom used slope soarers, trainer and any other "disposable" bits of fun.
Futaba in everything would be too expensive.
FrSky somehow seems too good to be true for me to feel confident in the better planes.
I would also be interested to know if anybody has seen inside the Futaba or Jeti Modules. What is the build quality like, particularly the robustness of the connection socket. This is my main area of concern with the FrSky (see other thread)!
Thanks
Chris
Moving on from 35 MHz (9 ZAP with mainly PCM 149 RXs)
Does anybody have first hand experience (good or bad) of the following.
Futaba 8 channel 2.4 module to go in my 9ZAP (about £118)
Futaba 7 channel receivers (currently on special offer at £50)
May also consider the equivalent Jeti gear. Their module is about £50 cheaper, receivers are a similar price.
My current thinking is either of the above for my better models (two receivers in the largest models to provide redundancy) plus my FrSky module (in a different transmitter) with their receivers for my seldom used slope soarers, trainer and any other "disposable" bits of fun.
Futaba in everything would be too expensive.
FrSky somehow seems too good to be true for me to feel confident in the better planes.
I would also be interested to know if anybody has seen inside the Futaba or Jeti Modules. What is the build quality like, particularly the robustness of the connection socket. This is my main area of concern with the FrSky (see other thread)!
Thanks
Chris