Postby Charlie Cox » May 9th, 2020, 6:28 pm
Hi John and Stuart,
I am no Saito expert, and would never profess to being one, however, I offer the following.
I had one of the first 60's sold in the UK. I fitted it to a Seagull Lysander, which was a perfect combination.
It was run at 17:1 on a fully synthetic two stroke oil and was run in for an hour on the ground before flying.
It worked perfectly, for about two to three hours flying, then, I'll not lie, a cylinder casing broke at the bottom casting.
Once we pulled the engine out, it was very obvious that the bolts holding the casing to the crankcase had loosened and the casing cracked and broke.
It was at the distributor on the Tuesday, (Broke on Sunday) and was in Japan by the end of the week. In the meantime, I had taken recipe of another engine.
It was the case at that time that there were three cases of the same in the US. The next week, Saito acknowledged that the securing bolts had little, or no thread lock on them and changed their processes there an then. I pulled the bolts out on my replacement engine, knowing it was an early one and thread locked them myself. One at a time I should add.
I never looked back, it ran perfectly for the next two years straight out of the box.
I sold it about a year ago, but I now have the engine back and its fitted to a TF FW190.
In the mealtime, we have had four others in our club. each one has been run in properly then flown and they just work, as you would hope with a Saito engine.
I have run an 84 as well, as have several of my flying buddies, and all have worked perfectly once run in and set up properly. No one has needed any modifications and they are all great, powerful great sounding units.
I know that in certain circles it is spouted that these engines will not run properly until they have has XYZ done to them.
Sorry, but in opinion, that's absolute rubbish.
So, in my opinion, fit and fly, oh, and I have baffles all mine as we all have to make sure they are cooled properly.
Hope that helps
Charlie