Its an interesting topic.
I actually work in the aerospace industry and am very familiar with aircraft certification requirements. Those requirements get opened to interpretation all the time and specific modifications to existing requirements, or new requirements get written all the time for specific projects where the design does not meet the "letter" of the requirement but can be equally as safe. Also many certification requirements have a published set of acceptable means of compliance to add some explanation for why the requirement says what it says, the interpretation of that requirement, and compliance demonstration means that are acceptable.
For a dry weight therefore it could be interpreted as exactly that "dry" so for electric its batteries but for Ic its without fuel. still what stops IC models having a ballast tank for CG trim as per full size aircraft, if the tank is empty it will not be in a safe CG range?
Still it tis what it tis untill it changes!!
Thanks for the feed back