Prop size equivalent

Any topic that is not suitable for the other topic items
Peter Smedley

Prop size equivalent

Postby Peter Smedley » December 28th, 2016, 7:54 am

Would I be correct in thinking that a 26x12 prop has the same load on an engine as a 28x10 ?

Only asking as I might have an issue with ground clearance.

Thanks

barrie burton
Posts: 142
Joined: December 4th, 2008, 12:54 pm

Re: Prop size equivalent

Postby barrie burton » December 28th, 2016, 2:39 pm

Peter according to an online software programme,the following applies

28x10, 549 ozs thrust @5000 rpm producing 6.47 hp with a level speed of 57 mph

26x12, 527 ozs thrust @5000 rpm producing 5.77 hp with a level speed of 57 mph

I am just guessing the revs and and wether the hp is produced or required is something an expert will tell you.

In my simple language a 26x12 prop will require less effort to turn it at the same revs,albeit producing 22ozs less thrust

Barrie Burton

Peter Smedley

Re: Prop size equivalent

Postby Peter Smedley » December 28th, 2016, 4:01 pm

Thanks for your help Barrie...the prop is for a 120cc flat twin for a 19kg high winger. There should be enough power on tap..

Dave Wilshere
Posts: 78
Joined: October 18th, 2013, 7:55 pm

Re: Prop size equivalent

Postby Dave Wilshere » December 28th, 2016, 7:19 pm

A 28 x 10 on a 120cc engine is light load, DA 100's swing a 28 x 10 happily. A 26 x 12 would be very light on a 120cc engine IMO
Do what the full scale did and add blades!

Peter Smedley

Re: Prop size equivalent

Postby Peter Smedley » December 28th, 2016, 7:43 pm

EME engines say 27x12 - 3 blade and 2 blade 28x10 , 28x12, 29x12 . The Mr Mulligan DGA-6 had a 2 blade....So, I suppose , who would notice a 3 blade whilst it was flying?


Return to “General Discussion Topics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests